The short version
- ClosingEvery first call runs on your own test: product, channels, spend, unit economics and the biggest growth constraint. A one-page proposal follows within a day, written for the people who were not on the call.
- ObjectionsFive common objections, each answered with proof from your own client reviews.
- Use this weekA fix for the booking page, an expansion lead at Learna's publisher, and prospects pulled from today's App Store charts.
- Finding dealsApps that already pay for users, found through Meta ads, funding, hiring and chart movement, and opened with a preview of the research your clients praise.
- First 30 daysLearn your close process and take calls from week one. The first outbound segment goes live in week three.
Closing the calls you book
Your apply page says what the first call is for: product, current channels, spend, unit economics and the biggest growth constraint, then whether creator-led growth can create more value than it costs. I would run every call around that test.
The first call
| Step | What I'm finding out | What I'd ask |
| Before the call | The closest Plutus case study, and whether they run paid ads | Ten minutes of prep: the application, their live Meta ads and their chart rank |
| Growth today | Where users come from now | "Where do new users come from today, and how much of that is paid?" |
| Economics | Whether $50K can pay back | "What do you pay per install or trial on paid, and what is a user worth to you after 90 days?" |
| Creative | How hard the paid team works for each winner | "How many new ad concepts does your team test a month, and how many become winners?" |
| History | Past creator work, good or bad | "Have you worked with creators before? What happened?" |
| Decision | Who else signs off, and on what | "Who else needs to agree to a test this size, and what will they want to see?" |
| Next step | A date on the calendar | "If the numbers work, can we go through a proposal together this week?" |
After the call
- A one-page proposal within 24 hours, written for whoever was not on the call: their own numbers, the closest case study, the 3 to 4 month plan, what success looks like by month two, and the price.
- The case study carries the argument. For a visual or lifestyle app that is What Colors: 63M views, 135K downloads and $67K in revenue in two months, in the founder's own review.
- Success is agreed in writing before the start, so the renewal conversation is about a number both sides already signed up to.
Two speeds of deal
2 to 3 weeks
The founder decides
Proposal the next day, a walkthrough within a week, then a yes or a clear no. A deal that goes quiet gets one useful follow-up a week, each with something new in it.
Up to 3 months
Several people approve
I map the approvers on the first call and give each one a page in their own terms: payback for finance, creative volume for growth, category proof for the founder. Then a dated close plan with the champion and a weekly check-in.
Handoff to delivery
Before kickoff, delivery gets a short brief in HubSpot: goals, the success metric, the hooks and angles discussed in the sale, every stakeholder and any red flags. The client meets the delivery lead within 48 hours of signing, so nothing said in the sale gets lost.
Objections, answered with your own proof
Every answer below leans on something a Plutus client said publicly on your apply page.
| Objection | My answer | Proof from your reviews |
| "We tried UGC ourselves and it was hit or miss." | That is where most teams start. The difference is volume: with 849 active creators, Plutus tests far more formats than an in-house team can, and the winners show up in the data. | Fluffle's founder called making UGC herself "time-consuming and hit or miss" before Plutus drove millions of views. |
| "We already run paid ads." | Good. Creator content feeds paid, because the formats that win organically become your next ads. | YKB moved a viral format found with Plutus into TikTok ads at a 15-cent CPI. |
| "$50K is a lot to test a channel." | It is, so we agree the success metric before we start and check it at month two. | What Colors: 63M views, 135K downloads and $67K in revenue in two months. |
| "We don't have time to manage creators." | Plutus recruits, briefs, replaces and reports, so your team reviews results instead of managing people. | Tea's founder called it "largely hands off." PrayScreen's founder pointed to the Looker dashboard and creators replaced without asking. |
| "We already work with a UGC agency." | Then compare the research and the reporting. Ask what each has learned about your audience so far. | Rork's founder called it "the best research from an Agency I've seen." SideShift's COO compared Plutus with more than 50 agencies. |
Use this week
Three things that do not depend on hiring me.
-
Let the booking page show its headline
On two fresh loads of your apply page, the Growth System Call scheduler opened on its own and covered the headline. On a phone it also covers the video and the Apply button. Opening it only when someone clicks Apply keeps your best proof in view first.
-
Learna's publisher has three more apps on the charts
Deep Flow, the publisher behind Learna (#2 in Education today), also has Bible Path at #12 in Reference, Arc Translate at #41 in Reference (released October 5) and Remly at #57 in Health and Fitness. That is an expansion conversation with a team that has already seen your results.
-
Ask the review wall for intros
Seventeen founders vouch for Plutus on your apply page, and several credit Alex by name. At this price, a warm intro from a happy founder usually beats any cold channel, and one ask after a strong month is enough.
Prospects from today's charts
US top free charts in Plutus's categories, pulled November 5. 225 apps released since 2024 sit in those top 100s, before removing names like Meta and Google. Three groups stand out:
| Group | Apps and rank | Why they fit |
| Studios with several apps | Next Vision: WoodSense #13, AntiqSnap #15, FoilSnap #24 and ToyWorth #99 in Reference. Brainstash: Deepstash #6, Empirio #81 and Paladin #95 in Education. | One relationship, several campaigns. |
| Faith apps | Bible Shorts #4, BibleScroll #8, Haven #18 and Creed #25 in Reference | Same category as Prayer Lock and PrayScreen, both on your review wall. |
| Language learning | LangLearn #9, YayTalk #13, Pingo AI #65 and Talko #69 in Education | Learna lookalikes, with Learna as the case study. |
Chart rank shows momentum, not budget. Each app still gets the Meta Ad Library check before anyone emails it.
Finding new deals
When the calendar runs light, this is the second source. It targets the apps your fit list already describes: consumer apps that are live or launching, US first, already spending on growth, and after more than a few inexpensive UGC videos.
Who to contact
- Seed to Series A: the founder or CEO, who owns the growth number at this stage.
- Series A and later: Head of Growth or Head of User Acquisition first, with the founder as a second thread on LinkedIn.
- Apps with a paid team: the performance creative lead too, since new winning ads are their problem to solve.
Signals that show intent
| Signal | Where it comes from | What it tells us |
| Ads live on Meta | Meta Ad Library, which shows every active ad with no login | They pay for users. Ad count does not show spend, so the apply form still confirms budget. An ad that has run for months is a winner the paid team leans on. |
| In TikTok's top ads | TikTok Creative Center, top ads by industry | A way to find active advertisers. TikTok's own ad library only covers Europe, so it cannot confirm a US app's ads. |
| Raised in the last 12 months | Crunchbase and Apollo funding filters | Budget is set aside. Apollo's funding data can lag a few weeks. |
| Hiring for growth, UA or creator roles | LinkedIn Jobs, careers pages | They are building the function in-house, and Plutus is the faster route. |
| Climbing a category chart | Apple's free top-chart feeds, Google Play charts | Timing. The prospects above came from this. |
| Same category as a Plutus win | Your case studies and reviews | The case study becomes the opener. |
Tier 1
Two or more signals
A personal first line, a snapshot with their own app in it, and both the founder and the growth lead contacted.
Tier 2
One signal
Category-level copy and the category snapshot. Accounts move up to Tier 1 when a second signal appears.
First touch and sample sequence
Consumer app founders hear from UGC shops every week, so a cold meeting ask blends in. Your reviews keep praising the research documents Plutus sends, so the first touch is a one-page preview of that research for the prospect's category.
The category snapshot
One page per category, refreshed each month
- The top organic short-form videos in the category from the last 30 days, with views, the hook and the format.
- What creator distribution has cost similar apps. Your case studies run from a $0.34 CPM (Learna AI) to $1.29 (Brainly).
- The closest Plutus case study and the apply link.
Hook angles for the prospect's own app stay for the call, which keeps a reason to book. I would build the template and pull the public data, and your creative team adds a line on what it is seeing in the category.
Sample sequence
For an education app running Meta ads. Three short emails over a week, one ask each and no links in the first email.
Day 1 · EmailSubject: {{app}} creative
Hi {{first_name}}, {{app}}'s longest-running Meta ad has been live since {{month}}. When one creative carries that long, the paid team is usually hunting for the next winner.
Plutus runs creator campaigns that bring in organic users and give paid teams new winning ads to scale. I put together a one-page snapshot of what is driving installs for education apps on TikTok this month.
Want me to send it?
Day 3 · EmailSame thread
Hi {{first_name}}, one example from your category: Learna AI reached #1 in the US App Store with 115M+ views at a $0.34 CPM.
Happy to send the education snapshot if it is useful.
Day 7 · EmailSame thread
Hi {{first_name}}, should I send the snapshot over, or close the loop for now?
Day 2 onward · LinkedInConnection request with no note, then one message after they accept
Thanks for connecting, {{first_name}}. I sent you a note about a creator snapshot for education apps. Happy to drop it here if that is easier.
A yes gets the snapshot the same day, with the apply link underneath.
Setup and first 30 days
- Sending: separate domains so growwithplutus.com and byplutus.com are never at risk, warmed inboxes (InboxKit), and Instantly as the sequencer. Open tracking stays off.
- Lists: pulled from the signal sources above, enriched through APIs including treg, Apify and MoltSets, and every address verified before it is uploaded.
- CRM: positive replies and booked meetings sync into HubSpot on their own, tagged with the signal and copy variant that produced them.
- LinkedIn: Sales Navigator, which the team already uses, with saved searches for Tier 1 accounts. If those searches move to Apify's API, Sales Navigator may not be needed.
- Cost: sending 100,000 emails a month runs about $500 to $600 in infrastructure (inboxes, domains and the sequencer). Lead data and verification come on top and depend on list size.
- First campaign: about the size of my last one, around 4,000 prospects across two segments.
New domains need about two weeks of warm-up before they send at volume, so they get bought on day one.
- Week 1Sit in on Alex's calls and learn the pricing and proposal. Buy domains and start warm-up.OutputCall notes, warm-up running
- Week 2Take calls with Alex reviewing. Build the proposal template and objection notes. Start LinkedIn, which needs no warm-up.OutputProposal template, first LinkedIn conversations
- Week 3Own the booked calls. Cold email goes live on the first segment.OutputProposals out, first replies
- Week 4Review close rate, pipeline and outbound numbers with Alex. Cut the weaker copy variant and add the second segment.OutputA forecast and a clear read on what to scale
What I'd report every week
Closing
Meetings held, close rate on qualified meetings, deals by stage with a forecast, and deals at risk with the reason.
Finding deals
Reply and positive reply rates, meetings booked and show rate, meetings that pass the economics check, and cost per qualified meeting.
Track record
I run outbound end to end today and take the calls it produces. My most recent cold email campaign:
$762K
Pipeline in under 3 weeks
12.4K emails to 4,375 business owners in my agency's ICP, sent from 34 inboxes. Four rounds of A/B tests, with the winning variant lifting replies 78% over the baseline. App founders are a different buyer, so the numbers will differ. What carries over is the method of testing small, measuring replies against pipeline and scaling the winner.
Before my agency, I spent four years selling B2B into enterprise brands, where deals ran through custom pricing, procurement and compliance reviews, and three years in business development at Toyota.
Questions for our call
- What objection comes up most on first calls: the economics, timing or another agency?
- When a deal stalls, what usually stalls it?
- What do you send after a first call today, and what do prospects ask for that you don't have yet?
- What does a clean handoff to delivery look like from your side?
- Where do booked calls come from today, and what does a client spend in total, including renewals?